Algorithmic Anxiety and Its Implications for Work Stress and Professional Self-Esteem among Employees in the Digital Age
Main Article Content
Rahmat Hidayat*
The digital transformation driven by the Fourth Industrial Revolution has introduced algorithmic management, a paradigm where artificial intelligence systems actively supervise, evaluate, and direct employees, creating unique psychological challenges known as algorithmic anxiety. This study aims to analyze the influence of algorithmic anxiety on work stress and professional self-esteem among employees in the digital era. Utilizing a quantitative approach with a causal associative design, the research involved 250 employees in Padang, aged 18 to 35, who work under algorithmic management systems, selected via convenience sampling. Data were collected through the Algorithmic Anxiety Scale (AAS), an adapted Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), and an adapted Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), and subsequently analyzed using simple linear regression. The results indicate that algorithmic anxiety significantly influences both work stress and professional self-esteem. Algorithmic anxiety positively correlates with work stress, while showing a negative correlation with professional self-esteem, accounting for an 8.8% variance in these dependent variables. Algorithmic management serves as a substantial source of psychological pressure in the modern workplace. Organizations should implement transparent algorithmic systems and provide psychological support programs to mitigate the negative impact of algorithmic anxiety on employee well-being and professional confidence.
Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2019). The Wrong Kind of AI? Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Labor Demand. https://doi.org/10.3386/w25682
Autor, D. H. (2015). Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.3.3
Bogen, M., & Rieke, A. (2018). An Examination of Hiring Algorithms, Equity, and Bias. Upturn. https://www.upturn.org/static/reports/2018/hiring-algorithms/files/Upturn -- Help Wanted - An Exploration of Hiring Algorithms, Equity and Bias.pdf
Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A Global Measure of Perceived Stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136404
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif Kuantitatif dan Campuran (Kuswanti (ed.)). Pustaka Pelajar.
Duggan, J., Sherman, U., Carbery, R., & McDonnell, A. (2020). Algorithmic management and app‐work in the gig economy: A research agenda for employment relations and HRM. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(1), 114–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12258
Faraj, S., Pachidi, S., & Sayegh, K. (2018). Working and organizing in the age of the learning algorithm. Information and Organization, 28(1), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.005
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019
Gray, M. L., & Suri, S. (2019). Ghost work: How to stop Silicon Valley from building a new global underclass. Harper Business.
Karasek, R. A. (1979). Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2), 285. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392498
Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020). Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 366–410. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0174
Lee, M. K., Kusbit, D., Metsky, E., & Dabbish, L. (2015). Working with Machines. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1603–1612. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702548
Möhlmann, M., & Zalmanson, L. (2017). Hands on the Wheel: Navigating Algorithmic Management and Uber Drivers’ Autonomy. International Conference on Interaction Sciences. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2017/DigitalPlatforms/Presentations/3/
Moore, P. V., & Joyce, S. (2020). Black box or hidden abode? The expansion and exposure of platform work managerialism. Review of International Political Economy, 27(4), 926–948. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2019.1627569
O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown.
Pasquale, F. (2015). The Black Box Society. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674736061
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Princeton University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt183pjjh
Rosenblat, A., & Stark, L. (2016). Algorithmic Labor and Information Asymmetries: A Case Study of Uber’s Drivers. International Journal of Communication, 10, 3758–3784. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/4892
Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. World Economic Forum.
Shekhar, A., & Saurombe, M. D. (2026). Algorithmic anxiety: AI, work, and the evolving psychological contract in digital discourse. Frontiers in Psychology, 17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1745164
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Wachter, S., & Mittelstadt, B. (2018). A Right to Reasonable Inferences: Re-Thinking Data Protection Law in the Age of Big Data and AI. https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/mu2kf
Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. Harvard Business School. https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=56791
