Ethical Use of AI in Education & Research: Frameworks for Responsible and Inclusive Learning
Main Article Content
Prithula Saha Prethwe
Rajib Chandra Das*
The accelerated advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has yielded substantial progress in both research and education, yet concurrently introduces complex ethical considerations. This research examines the ethical dimensions associated with deploying AI systems within educational contexts. Furthermore, AI contributes meaningfully to the advancement of education and research about Sustainable Development Goals 4 and 9. Nevertheless, attention must be directed toward the uncertainties engendered by specific apprehensions, including the notion that AI-driven systems might ultimately supplant human educators. The present study draws upon a comprehensive literature review, supplemented by reports and investigations conducted by researchers, institutions, and organizations dedicated to advancing AI and exploring its educational applications, alongside ethical concerns articulated by global experts and bodies. The findings aim to identify and discuss five salient ethical concerns pertaining to AI in education: hallucination, algorithmic bias, plagiarism, privacy, and transparency. The article culminates in a proposed framework designed to address these concerns and facilitate the ethical utilization of artificial intelligence by students and researchers, thereby promoting responsible AI practices within research and educational domains.
Abbas, C., & Teyebi, S. (2025). From Grammarly to GPT: Exploring the Use of AI-Assisted Academic Writing Tools Among Doctoral Researchers. JLT: Journal of Languages & Translation, 5(3), 134–150. https://journals.univ-chlef.dz/index.php/jlt/article/view/1031
Abd-Alrazaq, A., AlSaad, R., Alhuwail, D., Ahmed, A., Healy, P. M., Latifi, S., Aziz, S., Damseh, R., Alabed Alrazak, S., & Sheikh, J. (2023). Large Language Models in Medical Education: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions. JMIR Medical Education, 9, e48291. https://doi.org/10.2196/48291
Adams, C., Pente, P., Lemermeyer, G., & Rockwell, G. (2021). Artificial Intelligence Ethics Guidelines for K-12 Education: A Review of the Global Landscape. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 24–28). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78270-2_4
Anshari, M., Hamdan, M., Ahmad, N., Ali, E., & Haidi, H. (2022). COVID-19, artificial intelligence, ethical challenges and policy implications. AI & SOCIETY, 38(2), 707–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01471-6
Azmi, A., Arifin, S., Damayanti, Y. M., Triansyah, F. A., & Fitroh, I. (2026). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Ethical Challenges and Policy Implications for Inclusive Learning. Didakta: International Journal of Social Sciences, Language, and Education, 1(1), 27–35. https://researchfrontiers.id/didakta/article/view/8
Baker, R. S. (2019). Challenges for the Future of Educational Data Mining: The Baker Learning Analytics Prizes. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 11(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3554745
Bartlett, R. C., & Collins, S. D. (2011). Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. The University of Chicago Press.
Bezuidenhout, L., & Ratti, E. (2020). What does it mean to embed ethics in data science? An integrative approach based on microethics and virtues. AI & SOCIETY, 36(3), 939–953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01112-w
Borenstein, J., & Howard, A. (2020). Emerging challenges in AI and the need for AI ethics education. AI and Ethics, 1(1), 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-020-00002-7
Chen, C. (2023). AI Will Transform Teaching and Learning. Let’s Get it Right. Stanford University. https://hai.stanford.edu/news/ai-will-transform-teaching-and-learning-lets-get-it-right
Dergaa, I., Chamari, K., Zmijewski, P., & Ben Saad, H. (2023). From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing. Biology of Sport, 40(2), 615–622. https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.125623
Dignum, V. (2019). Responsible Artificial Intelligence. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30371-6
Duffy, H., & Weil, S. E. (2023). ChatGPT, Cheating, and the Future of Education. The Harvard Crimson. https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2023/2/23/chatgpt-scrut/
Eden, C. A., Chisom, O. N., & Adeniyi, I. S. (2024). Integrating AI in education: Opportunities, challenges, and ethical considerations. Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 10(2), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.30574/msarr.2024.10.2.0039
Gao, C. A., Howard, F. M., Markov, N. S., Dyer, E. C., Ramesh, S., Luo, Y., & Pearson, A. T. (2023). Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers. Npj Digital Medicine, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00819-6
Gichoya, J. W., Thomas, K., Celi, L. A., Safdar, N., Banerjee, I., Banja, J. D., Seyyed-Kalantari, L., Trivedi, H., & Purkayastha, S. (2023). AI pitfalls and what not to do: mitigating bias in AI. The British Journal of Radiology, 96(1150). https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20230023
Gneezy, U., & Rustichini, A. (2000). A Fine is a Price. The Journal of Legal Studies, 29(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1086/468061
Hagendorff, T. (2022). A Virtue-Based Framework to Support Putting AI Ethics into Practice. Philosophy & Technology, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00553-z
Haidt, J. (2007). The Happiness Hypothesis: Putting Ancient Wisdom and Philosophy to the Test of Modern Science. Arrow Books.
Howard, A., & Borenstein, J. (2017). The Ugly Truth About Ourselves and Our Robot Creations: The Problem of Bias and Social Inequity. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(5), 1521–1536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9975-2
Johnson, D. G. (2020). Can Engineering Ethics Be Taught? Yale University Press. https://yalebooks.yale.edu/2020/06/04/can-engineering-ethics-be-taught/
Khlaif, Z. N., Mousa, A., Hattab, M. K., Itmazi, J., Hassan, A. A., Sanmugam, M., & Ayyoub, A. (2023). The Potential and Concerns of Using AI in Scientific Research: ChatGPT Performance Evaluation. JMIR Medical Education, 9, e47049. https://doi.org/10.2196/47049
Kooli, C., & Chakraoui, R. (2025). AI-driven assistive technologies in inclusive education: benefits, challenges, and policy recommendations. Sustainable Futures, 10, 101042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101042
Kronemann, B., Kizgin, H., Rana, N., & K. Dwivedi, Y. (2023). How AI encourages consumers to share their secrets? The role of anthropomorphism, personalisation, and privacy concerns and avenues for future research. Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC, 27(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/sjme-10-2022-0213
Larsson, S., & Heintz, F. (2020). Transparency in artificial intelligence. Internet Policy Review, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.14763/2020.2.1469
Lee, P., Bubeck, S., & Petro, J. (2023). Benefits, Limits, and Risks of GPT-4 as an AI Chatbot for Medicine. New England Journal of Medicine, 388(13), 1233–1239. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsr2214184
Lim, W. M., Gunasekara, A., Pallant, J. L., Pallant, J. I., & Pechenkina, E. (2023). Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), 100790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100790
Manning, C., Zhuma, S., Nagrecha, S., Yessoufou, M., Koutogui, T., & Gruetzemacher, R. (2023). Streamlining science: Recreating systematic literature reviews with AI-Powered decision tools. 29th Annual Americas Conference on Information Systems. https://soar.wichita.edu/entities/publication/e4fcdc1f-c2f2-447e-a028-d53c735df4f0
Murari, U. K., & Parmar, H. (2025). Ethical Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Inclusive Education. In Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design (pp. 439–470). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-2262-9.ch015
Nguyen, A., Ngo, H. N., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Nguyen, B.-P. T. (2022). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 4221–4241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w
O’Connor, S., & Liu, H. (2023). Gender bias perpetuation and mitigation in AI technologies: challenges and opportunities. AI & SOCIETY, 39(4), 2045–2057. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01675-4
Rajkumar, R. (2024). What is AI? Everything to know about artificial intelligence. ZDNET. https://www.zdnet.com/article/what-is-ai-heres-everything-you-need-to-know-about-artificial-intelligence/
Rangaswamy, & Babu, R. (2021). Researcher’s Perception on Zotero and Mendeley Reference Management Tools: A Study. Library Philosophy and Practice, 5935, 1–11. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/5935/
Reiss, M. J. (2021). The use of AI in education: Practicalities and ethical considerations. London Review of Education, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.14324/lre.19.1.05
Saylam, S., Duman, N., Yildirim, Y., & Satsevich, K. (2023). Empowering education with AI: Addressing ethical concerns. London Journal of Social Sciences, 6, 39–48. https://doi.org/10.31039/ljss.2023.6.103
Sclater, N. (2017). Learning Analytics Explained. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315679563
Suseela, V. J. (2016). Plagiarism: The Academic Dishonesty The Significance of Anti-plagiarism Software (Tools) in Plagiarism Detection. Pearl : A Journal of Library and Information Science, 10(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.5958/0975-6922.2016.00002.4
Wach, K., Duong, C. D., Ejdys, J., Kazlauskaitė, R., Korzynski, P., Mazurek, G., Paliszkiewicz, J., & Ziemba, E. (2023). The dark side of generative artificial intelligence: A critical analysis of controversies and risks of ChatGPT. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 11(2), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.15678/eber.2023.110201
Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students’ cognitive abilities: a systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7
Zhou, J., Liang, Z., Fang, Y., & Zhou, Z. (2024). Exploring Public Response to ChatGPT With Sentiment Analysis and Knowledge Mapping. IEEE Access, 12, 50504–50516. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2024.3386362
