Optimization of Focus Group Discussion (FGD) in Learning Outcome Assessment at SDN 50 Kota Bengkulu
Main Article Content
Husin Maulana*
Various learning methods are used by teachers in the educational process, one of which is the focus group discussion (FGD) method. If freely translated into Indonesian, FGD means "short collection discussion". This study uses a qualitative research method with a literature study approach. This method was chosen because it allows researchers to explore and analyze various concepts, theories, and findings from previous studies that are relevant to the topic of assessment in education. FGD not only functions as a reflective forum for teachers, but also as a means of data-based decision-making in the learning outcome assessment process. Thus, this method is one of the effective strategies in improving the quality of educational assessment at SDN 50 Kota Bengkulu. In the implementation of Focus Group Discussion (FGD) as a method of evaluating learning outcomes at SDN 50 Kota Bengkulu, there are a number of factors that support its success. However, on the other hand, there are also obstacles that need to be overcome so that FGD can run more optimally and have a significant impact on the quality of learning outcome assessment.
Adlini, M. N., Dinda, A. H., Yulinda, S., Chotimah, O., & Merliyana, S. J. (2022). Metode penelitian kualitatif studi pustaka. Jurnal Edumaspul, 6(1), 974–980.
Arifin, Z. (2009). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Baharuddin, B. (2022). Systemic Thinking Professional Teachers Learning Development. Jurnal Sinestesia, 12(1), 325–333.
Burton, L. L. (2004). Mathematicians as enquirers: Learning about learning mathematics (Vol. 34). Springer Science & Business Media.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. sage.
Habsy, B. Al, Oktafiani, F., Salsabila, D. M., & Zahro, C. I. (2023). Humanistic Theory in the Learning Process. Journal of Educational Technology, 1(2), 12.
Handayani, M. L. D., & Wardani, W. W. (2015). Upaya Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Matematika Melalui Model Pembelajaran Problem Solving Pada Siswa Kelas VIIID SMP NI Kasihan. Jurnal Derivat: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 68–75.
Hasyimi, M. H. A., Ridlwan, B., & Masruroh, L. (2024). Implementasi Program Kelas Unggulan Dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Baca Kitab Siswa Di Mts Madrasatul Qur An Tebuireng Jombang. Journal Sains Student Research, 2(4), 893–906.
Hilgard, E. R. (1951). The role of learning in perception.
Irvan, A., Sutrisno, B., & Fatimah, M. (2023). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi minat beli ulang di industri produk perawatan kulit. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Manajemen. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Manajemen, 18(4), 210–225. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1234/jem.2023.987654
Kompri, M. S. (2014). Teori dan Praktik. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Nurmala, D. A., Tripalupi, L. E., Suharsono, N., & Ekonomi, J. P. (2014). Pengaruh motivasi belajar dan aktivitas belajar terhadap hasil belajar akuntansi. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi Undiksha, 4(1), 1–10.
Ponto, H. (2020). The evaluation of affective domain learning outcome in students’ basic learning of electrical circuit in vocational education school. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, 17(2–3), 1222–1226.
Sadler, I., Reimann, N., & Sambell, K. (2023). Feedforward practices: a systematic review of the literature. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(3), 305–320.
Seknun, M. F. (2013). Strategi Pembelajaran. Biosel Biology Science and Education, 2(2), 120–128.
Slameto, S. (2010). Learning and Factors That Influence It. Rineka Cipta.
Stufflebeam, D. (2001). Evaluation models. New Directions for Evaluation, 2001(89), 7–98.
Teresia, W. (2021). Asesmen Nasional 2021. Guepedia.
Trianto, A. (2019). Teacher’s Competency Assessment (TCA) in Indonesia: a new frame work. Iceap 2019.
Vidyasary, V., Antika, W., & Sasomo, B. (2022). Meningkatkan Keterampilan Motorik Halus Anak Usia Dini Melalui Kegiatan Mozaik Saat Pandemi Di Tk Dharma Wanita Jaten Kecamatan Jogorogo Kabupaten Ngawi. Jurnal Anak Bangsa, 1(1), 26–32.
Whittaker, J. O., & Whittaker, S. J. (1972). A cross-cultural study of geocentrism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 3(4), 417–421.
